April 10, 2008

Shouldn't a Determination of Cause be the First Step?

I read with interest the National Bishop's recent letter to all ELCIC members. Throughout the letter, reference is made to declining membership and resources in the ELCIC. It is a fact that since the beginning of the ELCIC in 1986 benevolence has declined by approximately 50% and membership has also declined by a significant percentage.

Not all churches are declining in attendance and financial resources. For example, the Alliance church in Calgary recently built a $20,000,000+ facility to accommodate their rapidly growing membership. Also in Calgary, Christ Lutheran church recently closed its doors despite there being tens of thousands more residents in Christ's drawing area than when it first opened its doors in the 1960s. Why are some churches growing and expanding while others, like the Anglican, United and Lutheran churches are shrinking?

What I find astounding is that the Bishop's letter outlines a proposed path forward without first identifying the reasons or the root cause of the serious decline in membership and resources. The proposed five-pillar approach will most certainly fail without first determining the reasons and root cause of the problems within the ELCIC.

Any entity, private, public, or not for profit, faced with the same serious problems as the ELCIC, would first undertake a comprehensive study to determine the reasons and the root cause of the problems. Only then would a path forward be developed. Such a study would obtain input from ALL of the constituents within the entity. Smart entities would commission an independent study group to report its findings to the Board (Council). This approach would remove any bias that some Board member(s) may have regarding a preferred path forward.

It is my opinion that if a proper and independent study was undertaken to determine the reasons for the current malaise in the ELCIC, it would find that the root cause is a transitioning to a radical theological makeover of the ELCIC which, in the extreme, embraces the radical beliefs of the likes of Marcus Borg. The same-sex blessing issue is a symptom of this deeper problem of watering down the Scriptures and the Lutheran Confessions. This issue continues to be promoted within our church even though it was defeated twice by the highest legislative authority of our church.

The Bishop's letter questions whether or not we can continue on our own: "If the answer is no, then the next question is.... who is the best partner or partners to work with in this area?".

The ELCIC's full communion partner, the Anglican Church of Canada, is actively promoting same-sex blessings - witness the motions put forward and passed at its recent national conventions, same-sex blessings being allowed by the bishop of one diocese (New Westminster) and three other dioceses (Ottawa, Montreal and Niagara) having recently given approval. In my opinion, a merger with the Anglican Church of Canada would accelerate the decline in membership and resources and lead to the financial and spiritual bankruptcy of the new merged entity.

Bob Schmidt
Calgary, Alberta